Nomi Violated its Privacy Policy by Tracking Customers, Says FTC

On Thursday, Nomi Technologies settled with the FTC (Federal Trade Commission) over concerns of a false opt-out contract. The organization, which permits vendors to track customers’ activities via their stores, created privacy policy that guaranteed it couldn’t keep.

The Federal Trade Commission indicted that Nomi’s privacy policy stated it would give buyers who would not like to be followed an approach to opt-out in-store and online. But on the contrary, for 9 months in 2013, company gave no chance to get of withdrawing in-store and didn’t tell clients. Other individuals who were being followed in light of the fact that they were simply passing close to a store — that they were being followed by any stretch of the imagination, the FTC said. Nomi (a US based in-store analytics solution service provider offering robust applications platform, sensors and suite of applications) did propose the online withdraw alternative on its site.

As per the FTC’s objection, Nomi’s rules said the organization would give an opt-out device at shops utilizing its service, the suggestion being that clients would be educated of where the following innovation is being used. Nomi’s issue wasn’t the tracking, however, the way that it didn’t tail its own privacy policy.

The director of Consumer Protection in FTC’s Bureau, Jessica Rich, said, “It’s vital that companies keep their privacy promises to consumers when working with emerging technologies, just as it is in any other context. If you tell a consumer that they will have choices about their privacy, you should make sure all of those choices are actually available to them.”

The organization gathered information on around 9 million cell phones in the middle of January and September 2013, and gave around 45 retail chains with knowledge on client conduct taking into account the anonymized information, for example, the rate of purchasers who passed the store contrasted with the individuals who entered, normal length of time of shopper visits, sorts of cell phones utilized by customers, rate of rehash clients, and number of clients who went to different stores within the same chain.

At the same time, Nomi’s privacy policy detailed it “pledged to … always allow consumers to opt out of Nomi’s service on its website, as well as at any retailer using Nomi’s technology.”

As indicated by the FTC, the opt-out choice is accessible on the web, yet not at any partaking stores. Far more terrible, customers were not informed of the tracking by any means.

Nomi has agreed, in any case, to roll out an improvement: Under Nomi’s settlement, the organization is restricted from distorting shopper alternatives for controlling their data; it likewise may not confine the degree to which individuals are informed about these tracking rehearses.

What we can take away from this clash is that, you never know if a company is actually obeying its own privacy policy you read while subscribing or not. Now what’s most wanted ‘fantasy’ of everyone online is to be able to erase their tracks online, ideally by themselves when a particular user is done with his/her online activity. Not long ago, Google reported that a person can easily remove its Google search history, so he/she can stay away from being tracked by anyone. Facebook, in the meantime, introduced a new ‘Anonymous Login’ Feature for the applications that will avoid tracking and you can browse anonymously. These are good trend setting moves from both giants (Google and Facebook), when we see it as a user perspective.

Ali Raza Ali is a freelance journalist, having 5 years of experience in web journalism and marketing. He contributes to various online publications. With a Master degree, now he combines his passions for writing about internet security and technology for SecurityGladiators. When he is not working, he loves traveling and playing games.
Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.